Part 1|| Is Graph3ne Ox1de In Their Secret Sauce?

First-in-human testing of graphene's safety shows "encouraging results"

Mar 04, 2024

∙ Paid

The Overton Window is the range of ideas/things the public is willing to consider and tolerate. In this post-truth world, facts slowly seep into frame to hand-hold the masses across the spectrum of acceptability — think lab leak. We knew this novel virus never came from a wet market and here we are four years later and the mainstream is just accepting the lab leak now. How many more years before people realize this wasn’t accidental but deliberate?

When it comes to graphene oxide, it is taboo to suggest this was put in the jabs. I was deleted from Twitter in 2021— for two years— for merely linking NanoTech King Charles Lieber with graphene oxide. I was guilty of Wrong Think. Yet again.

Even players in the medical freedom have shamed me (and others) for wondering whether graphene oxide G.O. is in the shots. I am more than just wondering, I am making a strong case.

Just last week, graphene experts rejoiced that the "first-in-human testing of graphene's safety” showed “encouraging results."

Small and ultrasmall graphene oxide nanosheets at a concentration of 200 μg m−3 or filtered air were inhaled for 2 h by 14 young healthy volunteers in repeated visits. Overall, graphene oxide nanosheet exposure was well tolerated with no adverse effects.

They tested a measly 14 people for only two hours and suggested no adverse effects on lung function, blood pressure, or most of the other biological parameters analyzed. "The team noticed a slight suggestion that inhalation of the material may influence the way the blood clots, but this effect was very small."

Blood clots? It’s just a very small side effect. Oh ok. No biggie.

Pharmakeia|| We R The Labrats Now

Let’s get something straight, Big Harma engages in sorcery. I envision a cauldron where they mix their witches’ brew. You know like growing mRNA in vats of E.Coli. Consider the endless amount of chemicals and unsavory ingredients they use in their pills and potions. Excuse me for not trusting Pfizer or the FDA but no one can tell us exactly what they put in these jabs, and different batches offered different concoctions.

I do think they tested graphene oxide on humans via the shots. While I cannot prove it, I even think they are lying about what they do with the blue blood of horseshoe crabs. They claim the crabs are instrumental in testing “life-saving” vaccines since the blood clots when it detects bacterial toxins. The horseshoe crab is phenomenally sensitive, picking up the tiniest traces of contamination. Despite a US Court order, the document released by Pfizer on its jab testing with Rhesus Macaques still had the number of endotoxins redacted. Why?

What if Big Pharma adds blue blood to help clot the blood? I know it’s an accusation of wicked proportions.

With that said, there is only ONE mention of graphene oxide in regards to the Pfizer documents. But with all their secrecy and omissions, doesn’t mean it’s not in voluminous pages we haven’t yet seen.

Arguably, graphene oxide was already included as an adjuvant in flu shots. In 2021, researchers at Georgia State University and Emory University discovered that a two-dimensional nanomaterial (polyethyleneimine functionalized graphene oxide nanoparticles) displayed potent adjuvant (immunoenhancing) effects on influenza vaccines delivered intranasally. (I am pretty sure this means snorting a graphene-laced vaccine up your nose.).

Here’s a PubMed paper on the progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant.

And here’s …

Part 1|| Is Graph3ne Ox1de In Their Secret Sauce?

First-in-human testing of graphene's safety shows "encouraging results"

Pharmakeia|| We R The Labrats Now

This post is for paid subscribers