The Supposed Saline Effect
Maryam covers the recent controversy surrounding pharmacies administering saline solutions instead of COVID-19 injections.
Article by Maryam Henein
Follow: Twitter | Instagram | Telegram | Gab | Facebook
Truth Lives Here: Rumble | Rokfin | Odysee | Brighteon | Bitchute | YouTube
Websites: MaryamHenein.com | HoneyColony.com | TheHiveWisdom.com
During a recent Australian Senate hearing to examine the legalities of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, Pfizer executives admitted their Oz-based staff were given a separate, private batch of the jab juice.
Pfizer Australia and New Zealand’s country medical director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and head of regulatory sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt said the reason was because they didn’t know if they had enough jabs to go around.
Ok.
“Pfizer undertook to import our vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that were being delivered to clinics as needed.”
So while the Australian TGA tested all of the COVID-19 vaccines in the country, Pfizer employees received special non-quality control ‘vaccines.'
We could only speculate but it’s odd, isn’t it, that they would give their Australian employees a version of the vaccine that was not tested by the Australian regulatory body?
Does that mean they were given a saline solution?
The Saline Special
In this game of Russian roulette, you better believe there are blanks.
Think about it: They bypassed the animals. Guinea pigs are us.
In June 2020, a symposium was held to debate the pros and cons of bypassing lab animals in the face of an “emergency.”
While I can no longer find that particular article, I assure you this is NOT how it usually works. While it isn’t enshrined in law, researchers almost always check that a new concoction is effective in lab animals before putting human volunteers at potential risk.