I strongly recommend reading this most disturbing interview from the 1970’s which was recently shared with me by a friend. Harold W Rosenthal was not a tin foil hat conspiracy theorist - he was a member of US Sen Jacob Javitz’s staff when he spilled the beans about the Zionist plan for world domination. This interview has remained hidden because it would upset not only Christians but Jews like myself who never want to see a world like this.
I’ve been reluctant to show this to a lot of people I know since it’s such an “in your face” account from an unlikely source. But the real tell tale point was Rosenthal’s murder which took place shortly after this interview. I’d like to show you a picture I took that speaks volumes about the code of silence that exists if you can provide an address.
I’m so glad you’ve taken an intelligent interest in the Protocols. It’s very important to my own work to get as many unbiased opinions as possible from as many real researcher-scientists as possible. To date, I have hundreds of scholars and self-taught researchers I depend upon, most of whom continue to be open minded and evolve their “understandings,” and I value all of them, though I do end up having about one-third attack me due to deep-seeded emotional agendas; preconceived notions not based on reality, in which I have none, whatsoever. I simply love real history and legitimate problem solving and science. I have no problem adjusting my understandings when I discover realities that allow for it.
For sure, there are many contradictions between the protocols and the author’s stated agenda, but this can be expected of all sociopaths, which “they” truly are. Just keep in mind their so-called religion they cover up with their slaves called Jews is just that; cover for Satanic rituals and the belief they are god; Satan itself; anti-God and anti-religion. Yes, very bazaar. Even more bazaar is the true meaning of the world Jew, the history of judaism and those who “manufactured” it and why.
I’ve read and listened to these protocols, and many other similar works, literally thousands of times—all of which dates prior to WWI, some documents prior to the American Civil War and some prior to Christianity and even the old Roman Empire. These philosophies are indeed ancient, but the Protocols that put it all together in a nutshell, literally, was started in the 1700-1800’s, then “obtained” and translated from Russian to English just prior to WWI.
I’ve determined a few understandings; the individuals who characterize the Protocols as a fraud, make-believe or plagiarism are either threatened by it or simply do not understand the history prior and after-the-fact, and some just intensely out of their minds.
What’s most relevant about these Protocols are the dates first discovered, translated and discussed by thousands of historians and researchers prior to WWI; the protocol’s contents as it relates to the realities of how major events in history have played out after their discovery concerning education (John Gatto’s interviews in my substack does a great job discussing the manipulation of education; Schooling by Rockefeller), the controls over all types of media, bought government officials & elections, currency & the creation of the private federal reserve, manipulation of trade, war & disease profiteering…and the oligarch’s (Rothschild, Rockefeller…) stated facts in public about these controls and the New World Order, particularly after WWII to date.
I’m constantly confronted by nameless bots as well as other professional historians who simply insist that the Protocols are fictional or plagiarism (plagiarized of/from what?? With no response), and I always retort the same as I have just explained above; it’s not so much about the author, but the dates discovered and it’s content, then the curious attacks by Zionists to shut down dialog. I also remind them I’ve no emotional attachment to any particular dog in the fight, so to speak; that I’m only interested in what I can “understand” as most likely or probable; real human-nature-elemented historical and scientific truths. And then they just go away knowing they have no foundation to suggest these Protocols should be ignored and forgotten due to their claim it’s nonsense—case closed. So crazy.
Recently I’ve had another substack writer (first name Sasha) insist that I must be a “religious satanic,” because I insist “self-arranging nanotechnology bioweapons” are real. I presented her facts along with a wager of $250K to debate me with agreed upon scientific judges, but she told me ‘that would be stupid,’ and then kept attacking me insisting it was her duty to correct me—by calling me names. I had to eventually block her; one of only two individuals I’ve had to block since starting my substack a year ago, which I really hate to do.
Just keep in mind that “their” (the Protocol authors) religion is a ritualistic satanic monster; a construct to enslave a people I now understand have never been Jewish, but are just the slaves of slavers who created the term Jew, which I keep telling my own Jewish friends and the few Rabbis who’ll even discuss it rationally, that the term Jew simply means “slave” and is originally neither a people or religion. Some have confirmed my understanding by their own research, which I’m writing about in my War-Economics Encyclopedia, which many brain-trapped slaves will not enjoy, and I do not apologize for. But my so-called “self-hating” Jewish friends who’d rather be non-practicing individual persons rather than slaves trapped to generational victimhood and never-ending war still love and respect me, and for that I am grateful.
I have read the Protocols over 20 years ago. Always left a bad taste of utmost horror. Then over the years the information became minimum and turned conspiracy.
As far as that SS poster "it" can go pound sand. Truly an inbred shill.
The one thing that can never be addressed is what behavior brought on the reaction like the expulsion of Jews from so many countries in the past. It is always some inborn hatred from a bad place in the heart. BS.
Hi, Skipper. You know, I’ve never liked unicorns, and I’ve never wasted a second searching for imaginary entities, doc. I’m a full-on scientist with the same ideologies and drive as Carl Sagan and John Gatto. I want to “know and understand” not “emotionally-believe.”
If I have an opinion that the world is a sphere because of my “understanding” of physics, nobody can tell me that that scientific opinion is “bias” (*an inclination of temperament or outlook especially : a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment : PREJUDICE) when in fact it’s an “unbiased opinion” satisfied with REASON based on science—what most scientists “understand” to be a greater, evolving truth. But we could go on and on and on debating nothing important about nothing important.
And you’re correct, no group of racists find themselves enslaved, in the middle of major conflicts and wars and then hated by the majority century after century because their version of racial tribalism, unfair trade with never ending war-for-profit is good.
Diversity by natural selection (interbreeding) creates healthier, stronger offspring more capable of surviving sudden natural changes of their natural environment, which is beautiful to other diversified life of the same species.
Eugenics ( with inbreeding) is a philosophy of very sick minds that MUST have suffered unnatural inbreeding generation after generation to be so unnatural and twisted generation after generation—which is my humble, “unbiased opinion” (*free from bias especially : free from all prejudice and favoritism : eminently fair // an “unbiased opinion”) based on my limited understanding of genetics and scientific observations.
“Bias” and “unbiased” opinion definitions taken from Webster dictionary*
Why couldnt the fabrication have been released by some Jews (not anti-semites) to create the thesis from which an antithesis can be generated so as to end up with their synthesized victimhood status.
Regardless, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck what does it matter
I strongly recommend reading this most disturbing interview from the 1970’s which was recently shared with me by a friend. Harold W Rosenthal was not a tin foil hat conspiracy theorist - he was a member of US Sen Jacob Javitz’s staff when he spilled the beans about the Zionist plan for world domination. This interview has remained hidden because it would upset not only Christians but Jews like myself who never want to see a world like this.
http://www.whale.to/b/hidden_tyranny.html
Saw this on another platform. Then removed.
Thanks for the link.
Thanks
I’ve been reluctant to show this to a lot of people I know since it’s such an “in your face” account from an unlikely source. But the real tell tale point was Rosenthal’s murder which took place shortly after this interview. I’d like to show you a picture I took that speaks volumes about the code of silence that exists if you can provide an address.
Yes,
Just e mailed you.
Thanks
There's an error in your link. You're missing the 'h' 'https'.
I fixed it thank you@@@
Thanks so much for posting this.
A 'refresher" of the most appalling .
please share now that i fixed the link. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
I fixed the link to the show. Thank you
I’m so glad you’ve taken an intelligent interest in the Protocols. It’s very important to my own work to get as many unbiased opinions as possible from as many real researcher-scientists as possible. To date, I have hundreds of scholars and self-taught researchers I depend upon, most of whom continue to be open minded and evolve their “understandings,” and I value all of them, though I do end up having about one-third attack me due to deep-seeded emotional agendas; preconceived notions not based on reality, in which I have none, whatsoever. I simply love real history and legitimate problem solving and science. I have no problem adjusting my understandings when I discover realities that allow for it.
For sure, there are many contradictions between the protocols and the author’s stated agenda, but this can be expected of all sociopaths, which “they” truly are. Just keep in mind their so-called religion they cover up with their slaves called Jews is just that; cover for Satanic rituals and the belief they are god; Satan itself; anti-God and anti-religion. Yes, very bazaar. Even more bazaar is the true meaning of the world Jew, the history of judaism and those who “manufactured” it and why.
I’ve read and listened to these protocols, and many other similar works, literally thousands of times—all of which dates prior to WWI, some documents prior to the American Civil War and some prior to Christianity and even the old Roman Empire. These philosophies are indeed ancient, but the Protocols that put it all together in a nutshell, literally, was started in the 1700-1800’s, then “obtained” and translated from Russian to English just prior to WWI.
I’ve determined a few understandings; the individuals who characterize the Protocols as a fraud, make-believe or plagiarism are either threatened by it or simply do not understand the history prior and after-the-fact, and some just intensely out of their minds.
What’s most relevant about these Protocols are the dates first discovered, translated and discussed by thousands of historians and researchers prior to WWI; the protocol’s contents as it relates to the realities of how major events in history have played out after their discovery concerning education (John Gatto’s interviews in my substack does a great job discussing the manipulation of education; Schooling by Rockefeller), the controls over all types of media, bought government officials & elections, currency & the creation of the private federal reserve, manipulation of trade, war & disease profiteering…and the oligarch’s (Rothschild, Rockefeller…) stated facts in public about these controls and the New World Order, particularly after WWII to date.
I’m constantly confronted by nameless bots as well as other professional historians who simply insist that the Protocols are fictional or plagiarism (plagiarized of/from what?? With no response), and I always retort the same as I have just explained above; it’s not so much about the author, but the dates discovered and it’s content, then the curious attacks by Zionists to shut down dialog. I also remind them I’ve no emotional attachment to any particular dog in the fight, so to speak; that I’m only interested in what I can “understand” as most likely or probable; real human-nature-elemented historical and scientific truths. And then they just go away knowing they have no foundation to suggest these Protocols should be ignored and forgotten due to their claim it’s nonsense—case closed. So crazy.
Recently I’ve had another substack writer (first name Sasha) insist that I must be a “religious satanic,” because I insist “self-arranging nanotechnology bioweapons” are real. I presented her facts along with a wager of $250K to debate me with agreed upon scientific judges, but she told me ‘that would be stupid,’ and then kept attacking me insisting it was her duty to correct me—by calling me names. I had to eventually block her; one of only two individuals I’ve had to block since starting my substack a year ago, which I really hate to do.
Just keep in mind that “their” (the Protocol authors) religion is a ritualistic satanic monster; a construct to enslave a people I now understand have never been Jewish, but are just the slaves of slavers who created the term Jew, which I keep telling my own Jewish friends and the few Rabbis who’ll even discuss it rationally, that the term Jew simply means “slave” and is originally neither a people or religion. Some have confirmed my understanding by their own research, which I’m writing about in my War-Economics Encyclopedia, which many brain-trapped slaves will not enjoy, and I do not apologize for. But my so-called “self-hating” Jewish friends who’d rather be non-practicing individual persons rather than slaves trapped to generational victimhood and never-ending war still love and respect me, and for that I am grateful.
Appreciate your informative post.
I have read the Protocols over 20 years ago. Always left a bad taste of utmost horror. Then over the years the information became minimum and turned conspiracy.
As far as that SS poster "it" can go pound sand. Truly an inbred shill.
Looking forward to your Encyclopedia
The one thing that can never be addressed is what behavior brought on the reaction like the expulsion of Jews from so many countries in the past. It is always some inborn hatred from a bad place in the heart. BS.
There is no such thing as an unbiased opinion. you are searching for unicorns.
Hi, Skipper. You know, I’ve never liked unicorns, and I’ve never wasted a second searching for imaginary entities, doc. I’m a full-on scientist with the same ideologies and drive as Carl Sagan and John Gatto. I want to “know and understand” not “emotionally-believe.”
If I have an opinion that the world is a sphere because of my “understanding” of physics, nobody can tell me that that scientific opinion is “bias” (*an inclination of temperament or outlook especially : a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment : PREJUDICE) when in fact it’s an “unbiased opinion” satisfied with REASON based on science—what most scientists “understand” to be a greater, evolving truth. But we could go on and on and on debating nothing important about nothing important.
And you’re correct, no group of racists find themselves enslaved, in the middle of major conflicts and wars and then hated by the majority century after century because their version of racial tribalism, unfair trade with never ending war-for-profit is good.
Diversity by natural selection (interbreeding) creates healthier, stronger offspring more capable of surviving sudden natural changes of their natural environment, which is beautiful to other diversified life of the same species.
Eugenics ( with inbreeding) is a philosophy of very sick minds that MUST have suffered unnatural inbreeding generation after generation to be so unnatural and twisted generation after generation—which is my humble, “unbiased opinion” (*free from bias especially : free from all prejudice and favoritism : eminently fair // an “unbiased opinion”) based on my limited understanding of genetics and scientific observations.
“Bias” and “unbiased” opinion definitions taken from Webster dictionary*
Why couldnt the fabrication have been released by some Jews (not anti-semites) to create the thesis from which an antithesis can be generated so as to end up with their synthesized victimhood status.
Regardless, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck what does it matter
I've tried the link to full episode and found it doesn't work
Peter Duke, David Duke's brother by another mother... a jewish one..